Do not believe the global warming hype
Many climatologists over-exaggerate their claims
March 6, 2019
In the 1970s, scientists were convinced that the earth was on the brink of entering an extreme ice age, but as we know, it did not occur. Today, experts are now overemphasizing the idea that humans are going to kill the earth by global warming. Sure, some science has changed, but how can we believe everything that climatologists say today?
Forbes compiled a list of some of the most common myths about global warming that scientists and news sources have claimed to be true. One of the biggest concerns on the list is about how global warming has caused the sea level to rise faster than ever before. It is true that the sea level has been rising for as long as it was scientifically measured, but there is no clear evidence that the sea level began to uncharacteristically rise since the most recent global warming theory came about, according to Forbes research. To further solidify my point, a study by NASA showed that the polar ice caps have actually grown in size instead of decreasing significantly, unlike what all of the climatologists have told us to believe.
I see the issue of global warming exactly how I see the other controversial concepts of gun control and immigration; all of these topics are purely political issues that both Republicans and Democrats take a stance on when an election is coming up. Both sides are able to milk out popularity and support on these topics. Then, whoever gets elected into office never accomplishes what they said they were going to do, because when the next election comes around, they will just bring up the same exact points to get elected once again. In the end, do not believe everything that you hear about these topics, because everyone from scientists to politicians over-exaggerates their claims.
Overall, people need to know that scientists and the media love drama, and they will over-exaggerate every small fact and detail that they can to make their story more appealing. The earth has gone through many hot and cold spells over the last 100 years, and every time, scientists make it out to be the end of the world. In the next 30 years or so there will probably be another concern of a grand ice age, and when the time comes I hope our society will be smart enough not to jump to conclusions.
Jon Do • Oct 4, 2021 at 11:03 am
To the comment,
“If there was such a thing as global warming it’s not coming from fossil fuels it’s coming from all the aircraft in the skies and the launching of rocket rides for sell.”
What fuel do you think aircraft burn? lol
While the article’s author makes a few fair points, the bits out “scientists love drama”. This statement is downright idiotic, and the ignorance is really showing. High school sophomore? Color me surprised. The author has no clue what drives people who get into science, it’s no way comparable to journalists or politicians.
David • Jun 3, 2022 at 8:19 am
If you want grant money you scientist will say what ever it takes to get it. I think it was science that gave us asbestos wasn’t it . How about the science that created nuclear waste. That’s been great so far
Larry lang • Aug 9, 2021 at 4:15 pm
If there was such a thing as global warming it’s not coming from fossil fuels it’s coming from all the aircraft in the skies and the launching of rocket rides for sell. The truth is,however, God created the heavens and the earth and he controls our environment not man.
Jerry • May 9, 2019 at 3:26 pm
I don’t want to waste this comments talking about whether this article has any merit to it- but perhaps this author should look more into the “studies” he is citing. First, the article that he cites is written by James Taylor, who does not speak on behalf of Forbes. He portrays this stance as one taken by Forbes, which they explicitly say is not the case. Second, if the author would have done a simple google search, he would have quickly realized that Neil Stenhouse, the leader of the study, said, “James Taylor’s interpretation of our study is wrong. We found high levels of expert consensus on human-caused climate change.” (https://www.whistleblower.org/politicization-of-climate-science/global-warming-denial-machine/taylor-distorts-poll-of-meteorologists-on-climate-change/).
This comment is not meant as an attack, but more an opportunity for the author to learn and improve their journalism skills.
Sandy Hawkins • Mar 9, 2019 at 5:52 pm
Articles in Forbes do not overturn a nearly 200 year-old body of scientific research. In addition, you have misrepresented NASA. NASA shows very clearly that Greenland and Antarctica have collectively lost an average of 413 billion tons of ice per year since 2002. If you add in Alaska and global glaciers, that number increases to 500 billion tons of ice per year. A recent study by glaciologists from the University of California, Irvine, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the Netherlands’ Utrecht University showed that Antarctica is losing six times more ice mass annually now than 40 years ago
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/
Jim • Mar 8, 2019 at 3:13 pm
What a collection of hooey. https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/forbes-james-taylor-top-10-global-warming-lies-that-may-shock-you/ You can always tell when the skeptic arguments are weak or non-existent when they pull out that tired and lame non-sequitur about “how the climate has changed before”. That’s almost as hilarious as misrepresenting the work of others. https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html